Monday, November 12, 2007

"Warlock or Mage?" The Answer, part 73,228,417

I was chatting it up recently with a Swedish Paladin buddy of mine that is looking to put together a competitive 3v3 Arena team. After talking about potential class composition and the changes being introduced in Patch 2.3, we digressed to the very irrelevant but oh so important topics of Euro Dance and Swedes being hottest people on the planet (sorry Brazil). But once back on track, we narrowed the team down to his Pally, a Warrior, and a clothie, kinda. Here's how the rest of the conversation went:

Pally: More DPS would be good. What about a Warlock or Mage?

Me: I dunno man. I guess it depends on your style. Warlocks have longevity, so that'd take a bit of healing pressure off of you. But Mages generally have greater burst damage.

Pally: Yeah, but a Fire Mage is also easy to kill.

Me: You're the one that'd be healing. You don't think you could keep one up?

Pally: It's not that. It'd just be nice to have both DPS and longevity. You think a Mage would be a better fit than an SL/SL Warlock?

Me: For DPS, big time. SL/SL 'locks don't rely on Shadow Bolts, don't have Shadowburn, and rely on DoTs or their channeled Drain Life to do dmg. That's hardly bursting damage, which you'll definitely notice when you need it fast.

Pally: But the mage, I mean, once he burns everything, he's pretty much a paper weight.

Me: Yeah, but stick a Mage and your Warrior on one target, and that'll probably be one less to worry about right quick.

Pally: Unless it's a Pally healing. He can just bubble and heal our target through the damage. Ugh, I guess it comes down to whether I want to try and out-DPS the other team's heals or outlast them.

Me: A Warlock for out-lasting, for sure. Better long-term mana efficiency and the other healers get to blow their mana on removing DoTS all match long. And don't forget that 'locks can drain mana. Might come in handy. But if you want to try and DPS a target down asap and try to catch healers off guard, a Mage would work better me thinks.

Pally: Bah. Maybe I should just grab a Hunter.

Me: lol, well, they don't wear cloth. And they are getting buffed big time in 2.3.

Pally: That, and people in my battle group fall for feign death all the time.

Me: lol!

Pally: And cloth for the lose come Ignore Armor.

Me: Cloth definitely for the lose.

Pally: So it's settled then. Pally, Warrior, and Hunter.

Me: Grats man.

So there you have it! When trying to choose between a Warlock and a Mage post Patch 2.3, go with the Hunter. We can now finally put this issue to rest. Thank you, Blizzard. So very much.

-_-

3 comments:

Jesyka said...

Doing 2v2 with Baz... we came across some fucking pain in the ass teams as a pally lock combo,lol.

For us though, I don't think we can completey judge any game by the class makeup alone - because neither of us had even a single ounce of resilience, so coming up against a team decked in it... hehe. Yeah.....

But I do remember a hunter/pally team... in the Ruins of L. arena... Baz and I just chilled in our spawn point to be jerks... and they came over... cept the hunter jumped behind the candlesticks in the spawn point and got stuck. So he was LOS from his angle... and couldnt shoot, his pally just watched him probably thinking what a moron. I ended up meleeing him down through the candles. All the while the pally is bitching 'gay, he can't shoot'

It's like don't be a fag and jump into dumb places then, mmk? :D

Good times.

Frost mages can live for a bit, btw... obviously not through everything - but they are frustrating as hell when played well.

JAGOeX said...

Yeah, Frost Mages have that "escape factor" that makes them annoying to deal with, but usually a Spell Lock or Silencing Shot followed by a boat load of DPS is enough to drop them without hassle.

Zyphre said...

cookie cutter teams are boring and don't know how to deal with non-cookie cutter compositions.